Comments on: Zombieland

By: IRS Audit

IRS Audit — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:09:11 +0000

Its such as you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this, such as you wrote the e-book in it or something. I feel that you can do with a few p.c. to drive the message house a little bit, however other than that, this is fantastic blog. A great read. I’ll certainly be back.

By: Jesus Chalk

Jesus Chalk — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:06:13 +0000

Those are just a females creepyest dream, i’ve been dealing with stretch marks for as long as i can remember, happy to come to the knowledge there is some hope … what took you so long !

By: Zombieland1

Zombieland1 — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:19:13 +0000

But what i hated was that naked zombie. y did they spoil the movie like that???

By: Zombieland1

Zombieland1 — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:18:12 +0000

Awesome movie! I loved it.

By: Maurita Talerico

Maurita Talerico — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:09:34 +0000

We use professional photo-scanners and filmscanners from NIKON.Resolution up to 4.000dpi.

By: ximena

ximena — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:38:57 +0000

that´s a realy great movie if you like the zombies´s movies also you can wacht 28 dias later and the second part 28 weeks later i think there is a 3rd parte but i´m not so sure so i hope you henjoy it

By: Ricky Bobby

Ricky Bobby — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:27:11 +0000

Iight

By: Rick

Rick — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:59:51 +0000

Gotta agree with Luke on this one … I loved the movie, just for what it was: a ZOMBIE movie. Not Godard. Not Altman. Not Ozu. A zombie flick, although a post-modern one, if you will: filled with meta and irony. As for “story,” it’s basically the same as in the avatar of the genre, Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead”: people running from hordes of crazed undead bent on eating them. What more do you need?

By: Luke Harrington

Luke Harrington — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:01:38 +0000

I think what I meant to say was that the film didn’t really need an “outward” story (i.e., it didn’t really matter what the characters were doing) because it was about interactions among the characters. In other words, all the motion was internal. It was a coming-of-age story. Granted, it was about as deep as a puddle in that regard, but the notes that it did hit rang true, as far as I was concerned.

But regardless, this film is intended as a crowd-pleaser and nothing more, so it’s a little silly to hold it to any sort of higher standard than that. It pleased the crowds. Ergo, it did its job well.

By: Paul Hood

Paul Hood — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:59:24 +0000

Thanks, Evan! Yeah, it’s all about the “Twinkie” defense.

By: Evan Derrick

Evan Derrick — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:22:49 +0000

I would have to agree with you completely, Paul. Luke and I argued in the parking lot afterwards. I maintained there was no real story, hence the film was much less than the sum of its parts (some of which were quite entertaining in and of themselves); Luke felt that the film didn’t need a story to be enjoyable.

After thinking about it a bit more, I believe it’s best to liken “Zombieland” to a twinkie, a metaphor that is apt considering Harrelson’s obsession. It’s not very filling, certainly not healthy for you, and will probably make you a worse person after consuming it, but gosh it sure does taste good for a little while.