<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moviezeal.com/w/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/</link>
	<description>The official podcast of MovieZeal.com, where film is always best discussed under the gentle influence of fine wine (as fine as $10 will get you). Each week Evan, Heather, and Luke pick a theme, discuss a theatrical release based on that theme, pop the cork and drink a wine that fits said theme, and finally subject one another to The Gauntlet, where forcing others to watch painful films nets you fabulous prizes. There is not anything else on the internets like it (literally).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:36:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-126761</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-126761</guid>
		<description>It just wouldn&#039;t be the Internet without the semi-literate ranting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just wouldn&#8217;t be the Internet without the semi-literate ranting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevyn Knox</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-126505</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevyn Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-126505</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That doesn&#039;t even deserve a response.  A straight-jacket, yes.  But not a response.  Okay, I suppose that was a response.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That doesn&#8217;t even deserve a response.  A straight-jacket, yes.  But not a response.  Okay, I suppose that was a response.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush is Better   -b.b</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-125626</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush is Better   -b.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-125626</guid>
		<description>ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS -BUSH- DID A WAY BETTER JOB THEN THIS FRAUD LIAR WE GOT NOW -obama-   ITS BEEN A YEAR ALMOST...JUST SAID (NO LIE) THE THE POLLS VOTE THAT HES DOING BAD ,RATINGS. FIRST PREZ IN HISTORY TO HAVE HIS RATING SO LOW..EVER!   TRUTH..DO SOME RESEARCH;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS -BUSH- DID A WAY BETTER JOB THEN THIS FRAUD LIAR WE GOT NOW -obama-   ITS BEEN A YEAR ALMOST&#8230;JUST SAID (NO LIE) THE THE POLLS VOTE THAT HES DOING BAD ,RATINGS. FIRST PREZ IN HISTORY TO HAVE HIS RATING SO LOW..EVER!   TRUTH..DO SOME RESEARCH;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mix - Latest News And Top Headlines From Around The Web! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Frost/Nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-38085</link>
		<dc:creator>Mix - Latest News And Top Headlines From Around The Web! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Frost/Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-38085</guid>
		<description>[...] David Frost&#8217;s infamous &#8216;77 interviews with the impeached President, is rivaled only by W. in its need to be this season&#8217;s Politically Relevant Film (Nixon is like Bush! Get it?), and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Frost&#8217;s infamous &#8216;77 interviews with the impeached President, is rivaled only by W. in its need to be this season&#8217;s Politically Relevant Film (Nixon is like Bush! Get it?), and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [review]: W. &#171; &#8230;yet made of stars</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-37863</link>
		<dc:creator>[review]: W. &#171; &#8230;yet made of stars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-37863</guid>
		<description>[...] January 10, 2009   Cross-posted at: MovieZeal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 10, 2009   Cross-posted at: MovieZeal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-20751</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-20751</guid>
		<description>Of course it&#039;s an oversimplification that the ruination of our economy, our own cities, and several foreign countries by the Bush administration was due to his Daddy issues, but they apparently played a huge part.  And from what I&#039;ve read, Stone gets it that the problem was that it was manipulated by neo-con sharks for their own ambitions and advantages.

Vis-a-vis the cross thing, why can&#039;t folks get the distinction that it&#039;s cynical manipulation of religion that&#039;s the problem, not religion itself?

Looks like I might have to see this one after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s an oversimplification that the ruination of our economy, our own cities, and several foreign countries by the Bush administration was due to his Daddy issues, but they apparently played a huge part.  And from what I&#8217;ve read, Stone gets it that the problem was that it was manipulated by neo-con sharks for their own ambitions and advantages.</p>
<p>Vis-a-vis the cross thing, why can&#8217;t folks get the distinction that it&#8217;s cynical manipulation of religion that&#8217;s the problem, not religion itself?</p>
<p>Looks like I might have to see this one after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sartre</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-20600</link>
		<dc:creator>sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-20600</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Luke, this is no laughing matter.  Daily Show maybe, biopic no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Luke, this is no laughing matter.  Daily Show maybe, biopic no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-20577</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-20577</guid>
		<description>I did see that. It was so inane that it wasn&#039;t worth dignifying with a mention in the review. :)

Sam, I&#039;d like to read that review, whenever it&#039;s done.

And Nick, I&#039;d say don&#039;t waste your time, I guess. It&#039;s not really worthy of whatever controversy it&#039;s generated (not much, I guess).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did see that. It was so inane that it wasn&#8217;t worth dignifying with a mention in the review. <img src='http://www.moviezeal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sam, I&#8217;d like to read that review, whenever it&#8217;s done.</p>
<p>And Nick, I&#8217;d say don&#8217;t waste your time, I guess. It&#8217;s not really worthy of whatever controversy it&#8217;s generated (not much, I guess).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-20576</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-20576</guid>
		<description>Did you happen to stay through the credits and see the giant cross at the end that promptly transforms into a W.?  It could possibly be the most absurd thing in the whole movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you happen to stay through the credits and see the giant cross at the end that promptly transforms into a W.?  It could possibly be the most absurd thing in the whole movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-20556</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-20556</guid>
		<description>This was a bad movie in a number of ways, but I will save my observations for my own review, which by and large conform to Luke&#039;s position.  I think you nailed it with this most excellent piece of criticism here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a bad movie in a number of ways, but I will save my observations for my own review, which by and large conform to Luke&#8217;s position.  I think you nailed it with this most excellent piece of criticism here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Plowman</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/w/comment-page-1/#comment-20552</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Plowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=1565#comment-20552</guid>
		<description>I have no idea when I get to see this, probably in a couple of months when everyone else has forgotten all about it, but I can’t wait I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea when I get to see this, probably in a couple of months when everyone else has forgotten all about it, but I can’t wait I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.742 seconds -->

