New on DVD Dec 08 2008 @ 02:00 pm

REVIEW: Horton Hears a Who?

By Phillip Johnston
United States, 2008
Directed By: Jimmy Hayward & Steve Martino
Written By: Ken Daurio & Cinco Paul
Starring: Jim Carrey, Steve Carell, Carol Burnett, Will Arnett
Running Time: 88 minutes
Rated G
(out of 5 stars)

This review was originally published March 21, 2008.

The work of Dr. Seuss has not had an easy life on the silver screen. Ron Howard’s How the Grinch Stole Christmas should top any conscious filmgoer’s list of worst Christmas films and the even more despicable The Cat in the Hat surely caused more than one heart attack at the Seuss estate. It is with these two films in mind that I walked into Blue Sky Animation’s production of Horton Hears a Who with trepidation. Would Hollywood again ravage the work of my favorite childhood author and leave it bleeding on the side of the road?

Horton Hears a Who is the story of Horton the elephant (voiced by Jim Carrey), a jovial and slightly dimwitted elephant living in the jungle of Nool. During the heat of the day, while bathing in the cool of pool, Horton hears something very small whiz by him and goes on a search to find out what it is. After earnestly looking he finds a small speck of dust. To Horton’s surprise, this is no ordinary particle, but the home to hundreds of Whos living in the town of Whoville. After talking to the eccentric mayor of Whoville, Horton takes it upon himself to protect this speck from its oppressors at whatever the cost and guide it to the safety of Mount Nool because “a person’s a person, no matter how small.”

Of course, the original Seuss book could never make a 90-minute film. Changes and additions are absolutely necessary and Blue Sky has done a fairly good job with them. Carol Burnett voices the kangaroo who abhors the idea of Horton taking care of a speck. She goes out of her way to try to destroy the speck (“For the sake of the children!”), even hiring a frightening bird-of-prey named Vlad (Will Arnett sounding scarily similar to Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises) to pursue it. These dimensions add extra tension to the jungle side of the story, but Whoville is fleshed out much more as well. Steve Carell voices the eccentric and dedicated mayor of Whoville who feels something has gone quite awry in his peaceful hamlet when Horton’s voice starts booming from the sky. By the end of the film it is his job to convince Whoville that Horton is real and that there is a whole world existing beyond their tiny speck.

The ideas behind these changes work well, but as they say, the devil is in the details. Animated films begin to falter when they pander to the obvious or expected joke. There are a few moments when the film gets completely distracted from the main story and indulges in moments of unnecessary stupidity. A prime example: when Horton decides that he is going to brave whatever is necessary in order to bring the speck to the shelter of Mt. Nool, the film blasts into a supercharged anime sequence so loud and overpowering that the intended audience reaction is nearly impossible. Where Seuss’ work has a timeless quality, these few attempts to be “hip” will alienate audiences ten years from now.

Aside from these things, the beauty of Seuss’ artistry is completely intact. To write off this adaptation because of a few bad additions would be to miss the beauty on display. The swooping and diving shots so obligatory to animated storytelling are put to good use here as the speck floats around the jungle of Nool and finds its home in different places before coming to Horton. The production design and the way characters look is distinctively “Seussian” and never seems distracting while the immediate story is being told. The narrative is presented in such brilliant color that it is hard to be distracted even when some moments become less than compelling.

There is a moment in Horton Hears a Who when the faithful pachyderm passively mentions the “inalienable rights” of the Whos on the speck. The phrase slips by in a flash and could be easy to miss, but it reveals the core of Dr. Seuss’ story. Filled with tasteful hyperbole and metaphors, it makes a hearkening statement about the right of all people to exist, no matter how small they may be; an important message for a culture where the idea of small people actually being people is under fire. It is said that Seuss didn’t like pro-life advocates projecting their message onto his work and it’s certainly understandable given that such a message may have not been his intent. Still, the film teaches respect for people of all sizes and instills a sense of wonder at the things beyond ourselves. In a slimy pool of animated dreck, Horton Hears a Who rises above and will delight and teach both kids and adults with its humor and message.

7 Responses to “Horton Hears a Who?”

  1. on Mar 22 2008 @ 12:13 am 1. Luke Harrington said …

    An interesting note: I may have been the one that first associated that line with the pro-life movement. I was a second-grader at a Lutheran elementary school, and they assigned us to write pro-life letters to President Clinton (yeah, yeah, I know–these are the joys or growing up in the evangelical Midwest). I had recently read the book, so I quoted Seuss in my letter. My teacher liked it so much, she showed it to pretty much everyone. A couple years later, I started noticing pro-life buttons and other stuff with the quote on it.

    Coincidence? Maybe. But the fact is, at the tender age of eight, I singlehandedly created and/or predicted a pro-life meme.

    (That and $1.50 gets me a cup of coffee.)

  2. on Mar 22 2008 @ 1:24 am 2. Fletch said …

    I couldn’t agree more on the “hip” attempts by the filmmakers. I greatly enjoyed the first 2-d animated sequence (that resembled Seuss’s drawings), but thought the anime one was pretty awful, as was the “WhoSpace” attempt. Without such desperate ploys, the movie would keep a timelessness that would hold its relevance – with them, it will just be dated as you say.

  3. on Mar 22 2008 @ 12:23 pm 3. Talualah said …

    I must respectfully disagree with Luke. God and I recently had a conversation wherein He told me that I really inspired the pro-life movement to use the slogan. Sadly, He also revealed that I will ultimately be blamed when the Dr. Seuss’s estate sues for copyright infringement. But God told me I’d win the lottery in the few months if I spent $100 every day on lottery tickets, so it’s no big deal to be sued. Huzzah!

  4. on Mar 22 2008 @ 12:35 pm 4. Evan Derrick said …

    I haven’t seen it myself, nor was I aware that the pro-lifers had used Horton, but its an interesting angle. I wonder how abortion advocates would respond to those claims?

    Talualah…let me know how that lottery thing works out for you. I tried something similar at the casinos, but alas, it backfired a bit. :)

  5. on Mar 22 2008 @ 12:39 pm 5. Nick Plowman said …

    I want to see this now, I am told it is not a bad film, as long as I do not expect anything like Dr. Seuss’s genius. I’ll take my little sister along with me, who knows, it could be fun.

  6. on Mar 22 2008 @ 1:31 pm 6. Phillip Johnston said …

    Talualah: it’s amazing how that kind of thing works for people. Especially if you’re the head of a large evangelical thinktank.

  7. on Mar 24 2008 @ 11:42 am 7. Craig Kennedy said …

    Phillip, it sounds like we had pretty much the same experience all around. I was also very skeptical, but mostly pleased with the result.

    The anime sequence for me was the only really bad misstep and it wasn’t enough to kill what was otherwise a likeable film.

    I didn’t even mind the expanded Whoville plotline. As you said, something needed to be expanded to make it work as a 90 minute movie.

    I have a small complaint about Carrey’s Horton. He was good and funny and all, but he wasn’t the Horton I grew up with. A small quibble maybe, but that kind of stuff is important to me.

    As Suess, I’d give it a C+
    As a cartoon on its own I’d give it a B

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply