Reviews Apr 03 2008 @ 08:00 am
REVIEW: Hitman
Directed By: Xavier Gens
Written By: Skip Woods
Starring: Timothy Olyphant, Dougray Scott, Olga Kurylenko
Running Time: 100 minutes
Rated R for strong bloody violence, language and some sexuality/nudity
Well, I’m here to tell you that Hitman is an awesome contribution to the halls of cinema, and by ‘awesome’ I mean ‘not awesome’ and by ‘halls of cinema’ I mean ‘tradition of consistently pathetic video game adaptations.’ I guess I have to look on the bright side: this review will be an awful lot of fun to write.
So there’s this place where they train kids from childhood to become super assassins that’s shown in brief vignettes during the opening credits. These guys are the best of the best, ‘ghosts’ that can kill anyone, anywhere. They also all have shaved heads and a barcode tattooed into the back of their skulls which, when you think about it, is only a few rungs down on the conspicuous ladder from bright-red-mohawk-with-blue-dyed-skin. Anyways, Timothy Olyphant plays number 47, one of the aforementioned super assassins, who’s being tracked by an Interpol cop (Dougray Scott), and when extraterrestrials take over Moscow and turn the locals into farting monkeys, 47 will have to team up with a Russian beauty (Olga Kurylenko) to save the world by proving that his inner child isn’t dead and that yes, gosh-darnit, people do like him! Also, I made some of that up.

"Price check on pretty bald assassin, Aisle 5!"
But who cares about the plot when I can talk about what is easily the most fascinating part of this film: the credits. I’m not sure if the director or writer were smoking a little too much of the wacky-tabacky that day, or if the guy on credits duty got a little too enthusiastic with his work, but they are pretty sweet (in an inexplicable sort of way). For example, a number of the cast have the word ‘another’ placed in front of their title: ANOTHER DEALER, ANOTHER OFFICER, etc. I’m sure the thinking went that since DEALER and OFFICER are soooo passé, it would be much more mysterious if they were ‘Another’ one of their respective occupations, leading me to the obvious conclusion that we all wear masks to hide who we really are, and that my rebirth will occur only when I become ‘Evan’ instead of ‘Another Evan,’ which is a masquerade my sub-conscious conducts for the world. Thankyou Hitman, thankyou.
There are also credits like SWANKY RESTARUANT WAITER and YURI’S GUY #3. The former led me to go back and re-watch the scene in question, revealing that yes indeed, there was a slight swankiness in the corner of the actor’s eyes that gave the whole episode a delicate subtext that had completely gone over my head before. The latter, as I’m sure you’ll agree, raises some troubling existential questions, since GUY #1 and #2 are conspicuously absent. Most telling of all is that the film was directed by Xavier Gens, written by Skip Woods, and executive produced by Vin Diesel. Contrary to popular opinion, the sweetest movie in the world does not coalesce from putting people named Xavier, Skip, and Vin in a room together. Sigh, if only there had been an Uwe in the mix, things might have turned out differently.

#47 is totally serious about stuff. Seriously.
I can hear the question you’re sure to be asking right now: “Ok, I get that the credits are pretty sweet, but does Hitman deliver on the juicy cinematic clichés?” I’m glad you asked! Yes, yes it does. There is the John Woo Mexican Standoff Not Directed By John Woo (why have just two people pointing guns at each other and not shooting when you can have four?), the Character Who Possesses Omniscient Bible Trivia Skills (I totally believe he could recall Psalm 35 from memory!), the Ethnic Characters Who Start Talking In Their Native Language But Break Into English When They Get Tired Of The Subtitles, and the ever popular Insta-Chemistry (for those of you not in the know, that’s when a director gets tired of pretending his romantic leads possess even a shred of passion betwixt one another and just has them fall in love…magically. Also known as the Colin Farrell-Li Gong effect).
In all seriousness, does Hitman accomplish anything that it sets out to do? It is gorgeous (props to cinematographer Laurent Bares), there are some mildly decent action sequences (even if they are painfully obvious rip offs of Die Hard and The Matrix), and there are the requisite videogame shout-outs (which, I have to admit, were handled quite unobtrusively). But if you’re looking to scratch that blood ‘n bullets guilty pleasure itch, rent Shoot ‘Em Up or see the original Die Hard instead. Don’t worry about losing any sleep wondering whether or not the elusive videogame adaptation masterpiece has finally been unearthed.
















on Apr 03 2008 @ 8:26 am 1. Ryan Walker said …
They could have made this movie so much better. Im upset with it. really upset.
on Apr 03 2008 @ 10:17 am 2. Luke Harrington said …
Dude…that’s like four jabs at Uwe Boll on MZ in, like, less than a month. You better watch out, or you could find yourself in the ring.
I think the reason videogame movies always suck is because a film can’t possibly add anything to a videogame–especially now that videogames are all 50+ hours long, and in HD and surround sound and whatnot. Hollywood understands how to milk a book phenomenon for all it’s worth, but they haven’t yet figured out how to respond to new media.
That and they probably just hold gamers in complete contempt and assume they’ll swallow whatever crap they throw at them. Which might actually be the case.
on May 15 2008 @ 6:44 pm 3. ron said …
This review is pretty silly. Hitman is a movie based on a video game. When is the last time you saw a movie adaptation of a video game that was intelligent?
That’s what I thought.
The movie does exactly what it is supposed to do – entertain. No one watched this movie expecting depth of characters or even believable relationships. For an action movie it did just enough suspension of disbelief to allow us to enjoy the action.
Can you really say that the mexican standoff did absolutely nothing for you? Come on, admit it, it was fun! Having these guys look at each other and decide to go the informal route is definitely a good moment. Professional courtesy among the assasins.
Roger Ebert said it best “This movie is on the threshold between a game and art. It’s on the wrong side of it, but give it credit for trying.”
Frankly, I think it was better than any of the movies in the Die Hard series.
on May 15 2008 @ 9:08 pm 4. Evan Derrick said …
“This review is pretty silly.”
Kind of like the movie?
“Can you really say that the mexican standoff did absolutely nothing for you?”
Have you ever seen Hard Boiled or The Killer? Heck, even Face-Off? The Mexican stand-off here is poor parody of the real deal.
Trust me, I’m pretty forgiving when it comes to action flicks. They are my guilty pleasure of choice. The action in this one is decent, but its surrounded by stupidity. The first Die Hard is one of the great action flicks, and the others are quite serviceable. This one is pretty pictures surrounded by stupidity.
But hey, I consider The Rundown to be in my top ten, so what do I know?
on Mar 07 2009 @ 12:06 am 5. JOSE TAPIA said …
MOVIE WAS COOL BUT IM GETTING THAT TATTOO 2MORROW
on Mar 07 2009 @ 7:00 am 6. Luke Harrington said …
^ …if anyone was wondering why Hollywood still makes brain-dead action movies…