New on DVD Nov 18 2008 @ 01:27 pm

REVIEW: Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson

By Evan Derrick
United States, 2008
Directed By: Alex Gibney
Written By: Alex Gibney (screenplay) and Hunter S. Thompson (writings)
Starring: Hunter S. Thompson, Johnny Depp, Jimmy Carter, George McGovern, Jimmy Buffet, Tom Wolfe
Running Time: 120 minutes
Rated R for drug and sexual content, language and some nudity
(out of 5 stars)

Gonzo feels like a pit stop for documentarian Alex Gibney. After socio-relevant films like Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (corporate corruption) and Taxi to the Dark Side (torture and the war on terror) and before tackling Freakonomics (overflowing with hot-button issues like abortion and drug dealing, currently in production), Gibney directed Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson (entirely self-explanatory). You can’t shake the feeling, however, that this one was phoned in. Moments of fascinating relevance shine like blips on a radar screen before fading into generic biodoc filmmaking. It’s a portrait of a unique individual that, sadly, was painted by number far too often.

The man himself, never separated from one of his beloved cigarettes.
The man himself, never separated from one of his beloved cigarettes.

Gibney charts Thompson’s evolution as a writer from his groundbreaking “embedded” reporting with the Hell’s Angels to his blistering political screeds for Rolling Stone. Along the way are interviews with wives and friends and enemies, politicos that he helped and hindered, narration by Johnny Depp, reams of home movies (Gibney is obsessed with apparently limitless footage of Thompson in a Nixon mask – a metaphor for Thompson’s dual nature, although we got the point the first time, thank you), and clips from other films about the gonzo journalist. There are so many clips, in fact, that Gonzo begins to feel cobbled together and padded out, desperately stretching for a 120 minute runtime when 100 would have served the material much better.

The political interludes pack the film’s real punch. Detailing Thompson’s stints on the campaign trails of ‘68, ‘72, and ‘76, these sections are eye-openers for those of us who did not live through that era. From the Democratic Convention protests in Chicago to George McGovern’s failed campaign to Nixon’s eerie political similarities with George Bush, Thompson provided a biting, drug-fueled perspective on the defining events of his time. And in light of our new President Elect and the hope he has brought with him to America, I finally understand the devastating effect that John and Robert Kennedy’s assassinations had on the nation. The rest of the doc is sub-par in comparison to such piercing moments.

Somone was obsessed with guns.
Somone was obsessed with guns.

Gibney seems to have rushed in with his Academy Award, slapped Gonzo together, and rushed out to tackle something more popular (Freakonomics has sold 3 million copies thus far). I don’t blame him, since Hunter Thompson never struck a chord with me (I was born 4 months shy of the seventies, so perhaps he never could have). But skulking beneath the layers of “Hunter did this” and “Then Hunter did that” lies an incendiary documentary with the power to kick political malaise in the balls. Too bad, then. Much like Thompson did when he ended his life at the end of one of his beloved guns, Gonzo takes the easy way out.

4 Responses to “Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson”

  1. on Nov 18 2008 @ 6:10 pm 1. Rick Olson said …

    in light of our new President Elect and the hope he has brought with him to America, I finally understand the devastating effect that John and Robert Kennedy’s assassinations had on the nation.

    Great observation, Evan … those of us who were, ahem!, there all have a lurking fear of this happening this time around … they killed the Kennedy’s and look what we got.

  2. on Nov 20 2008 @ 10:24 pm 2. christian said …

    I’m going to watch this but it does seem rote. Tough to find a new tact but try to cull rare footage. He’s a great writer and re-reading him I’m always struck by his observations. And was the excess that real?

  3. on Nov 21 2008 @ 9:28 am 3. Evan Derrick said …

    Thanks, Rick. It was a startling moment for me that I wasn’t expecting.

    Christian, you might enjoy it more than I did since you have a built-in appreciation of Thompson. Or, you might just be that much more bored with it. I wasn’t an enormous Fear and Loathing fan, but you have to admit it had a consistent style that mimicked the book as best as could be expected. This doc never finds a stylistic groove – it too often looks cheap. For a doc shot in the moment (see Dear Zachary) I can understand that, but for pre-planned biography it’s unforgivable.

  4. on Jul 24 2009 @ 5:57 am 4. madeleine sloan said …

    Americans love a cheap freak side show. That is exactly what Hunter S.
    Thompson gave them. Unfortunately for him, Hunter ended up roadkill on
    the ” proud highway “; vultures and hyenas picking at the carcass, the same
    way they picked his flesh clean in life.
    http://madeleinesloan.blogspot.com blowback, copyright 2007

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply