In Theaters Jul 16 2009 @ 06:00 am
REVIEW: (500) Days of Summer
Directed By: Mark Webb
Written By: Scott Neustadter & Michael H. Weber
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Running Time: 95 minutes minutes
Rated PG-13 for sexual material and language.
An earlier form of this review was originally posted at Wonders in the Dark.
The first five minutes of director Mark Webb’s (500) Days of Summer, a concise and entertaining treatise on young love, are immediately transporting. There is a narrator, there are attractive (but not fake looking) leading characters, the music is zippy, and Webb introduces his leading players as if they were walking in a narrative music video. It’s a beautiful amalgamation that can’t help but prompt an ear-to-ear smile. (500) Days’ narrator has booming voice with commanding presence. The story gets even more interesting directly following this masterful introduction when he makes the audience a promise: “This is not a love story.”
So, in the spirit of the film, I’ll put an embargo on the word “love” from here on out. It’s just one of the ways this story is atypical – a boy-meets-girl story the likes of which we haven’t seen before and one that is completely necessary in order to publicly state the romantic inclinations of millions of postmodern 20-somethings.
Joseph Gordon Levitt (Mysterious Skin, The Lookout) stars as Tom, a puppy-dog faced twenty-something slogging the days away in a greeting card company cubicle. He’s almost falling asleep at a round-table meeting one morning when he sees her: Summer (Zooey Deschanel), the new girl – an improbably cute young woman with a timeless fashion sense straight out of Godard’s Masculin, féminin and bewitching blue eyes that flash with more mystery than sex appeal. The initial attraction is awkward, but both of them realize that there just might be something there.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel
Tom and Summer’s perspective on relationships differ vastly. He is a capital-R romantic and gets his definition of relational intimacy from listening to too much British pop music and completely misreading The Graduate when he was a pre-teen. Summer is, in short, a goddess. Since her teen years she’s been making men do double-takes on buses and busy streets. She’s been around the dating block and is at the point where she doesn’t believe in that precarious L-word at all. She’s honest about it with Tom, too, and this honesty is one of Tom’s favorite things about her even though it often hurts.

They meet again.
She and him hate words like boyfriend or girlfriend because, really, no one knows what they mean. They’ve realized that there are no clear definitions for any of these matters and that to define them would be juvenile. Despite this, it seems like they might be made for each other. They’re sleeping together regularly and having the fun times that only people who share a special bond can have. Summer has even begun telling Tom things that she’s never told anyone else. What else is Tom supposed to think?
It may all sound familiar, but the film has something most romantic comedies lack – structure. (500) Days of Summer refers to the 500 days that Tom and Summer developed their relationship and the movie skips back and forth from their relational ups and downs, each event informing another whether it be Day 58 or Day 398. The whole story is told strictly from Tom’s perspective and we see firsthand how his expectations for what a relationship should look like clash with the (sometimes) bleak reality of what ultimately comes to fruition.

The bewitching Deschanel
Still, whether its Day 169 or Day 427, Tom and Summer never really know what they want out of being together. Is it companionship? Is it sex? Or is it simply someone to scream “PENIS” with in the park at the top of your lungs? Perhaps its all three. The reason why they’re constantly floundering in indecision is clear: their definition of what it means to be together has been skewed not by bad experiences with other companions but by sitcoms, pop songs, greeting cards, and romantic comedies. All Tom wants is a bit of emotional honesty and that’s something that can only rarely be found.
Joseph Gordon Levitt and Zooey Deschanel are radiant as Tom and Summer, although its possible that Deschanel will never give a better performance than she did in David Gordon Green’s All the Real Girls. Even so, the script lets the actress keep her undeniable quirkiness and even makes room for her to sing a song – a blessing for fans of She & Him who can’t get enough of her singing voice. Levitt and Deschanel make an attractive couple for sure, but it also helps that they look like real people.

Director Mark Webb (far right) and his two stars
Following the screening I attended, director Marc Webb described the style of the movie as “kitchen-sink.” There’s no better way to describe it. There are nods to Truffaut and Bergman, a musical sequence complete with an animated bluebird, characters sometimes break the fourth wall, and the poppy soundtrack seems to dictate the film’s movements and not vice versa.
I’m tempted to say that the script’s problems are rendered null by the end of the film. I found two character’s particularly annoying – the clichés of “smart little kid” and “crazy sidekick friend” are a bit overused – but the charm of the leads and the unexpected ending made me forget these. Beginning to end, the movie presses forward with an earned amount of whimsy and is void of the self-conscious Indie culture references that plagued Juno and riddle the screenplay of Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist.
There’s a lot of hope at the end of this film – it will leave audiences with a smile – but the last five minutes offer a promise of happiness that seems different from the happiness strived for in the first 90. This unexpected twist is just one of the many things that make (500) Days of Summer an experience-laden ode to those disorienting times when happiness seems just within your grasp and the work that must be done to finally claim it as your own. Like When Harry Met Sally and Annie Hall, I think (500) Days of Summer will be sticking around for a while.















on Jul 24 2009 @ 8:51 am 1. Evan Derrick said …
I have free passes to this one next week. Rom-coms are hardly ever my thing, but this looks like it breaks the mold.
However, your reference to the director’s label of “kitchen sink” worries me slightly. Mashing that many conventions and genre nods together can be risky , simply because the response to them may vary greatly between audience members. While I loved “The Fall,” I can understand why other people hated it. It walked such a thin line – is it comedy? fantasy? drama? a fairy tale? – that if any little moment irritated you, it was all over.
Is (500) Days similiar? Meaning, if someone despised the film, could you fault them for it?
on Aug 04 2009 @ 10:09 am 2. J Catlett said …
This Is One Of The Best Rom Coms I Have Ever Seen. I Usually Do Not Like Them But This One Is Not Typical. It Is Very Unique. 500 Days Of Summer Does Not Subscribe To Any Label.
on Jan 04 2010 @ 10:04 am 3. shabnam said …
i just wanted to figure out the facts that summer realized..what was she actually doing..she liked him but one day there was this guy and she realized he is the one for her..which was the similar realization tom had when he first saw summer…so whats the circle??
and about the emotional honesty..she was honest throughout the 500 days..but if she actually was honest why did she kept it hidden that she was engaged. isn’t it because she wanted to have fun again with this puppy face because she knew he can never say ‘no’ to her?
i really really liked the character summer a lot but in real life isn’t she a kind of girl who is known as the whore or the slut of the story……
on May 01 2010 @ 2:15 pm 4. casinos said …
Your blog caught my eye. Thanks for sharing this information.
on Oct 26 2010 @ 5:42 pm 5. Katelin Skafec said …
Skip Hop Studio Diaper Tote Bag is awesome.So numerous wallets – and not really these small, worthless pockets, either. Almost all of the actual storage compartments are a good dimension and actually assist maintain every thing organized. The handles are a excellent length and fit nicely over the shoulder; the handle straps additionally remain put on my own arm, which is important when you are holding a child. The bag appears wonderful, as well. Not as well fancy, but not too casual. (I have it in black) The material is soft (can’t believe of a much better word) so it’s simple to squeeze in to tight spaces – but yet it is sturdy. I’ve a Fleurville Lexi carry and I love it, as well, but that bag is type of rigid. I believe this Skip*Hop will turn out to be my daily handbag. It is a little bit huge – so if you’re not really in to substantial hand bags this might be much better as an over-night baby diaper handbag.
on Feb 11 2011 @ 8:44 am 6. yemek tarifleri said …
çok güzel bir site.sürekli giriyorum.başarılarınızın devamını dilerim.ben de böyle bir site yapmak isterim
on May 10 2011 @ 6:54 am 7. Rochell Wai said …
I am really impressed. Today I spent a lot of time trying to find something interesting on this topic. Finally I got to your site. Thanks for that!
on May 29 2011 @ 2:24 pm 8. Robert Lewis said …
I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I’m quite sure I¡¦ll learn many new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!
on Jul 04 2011 @ 4:08 pm 9. Movies said …
Wonderful online video media . Thanks a lot for present . This websites is undoubtedly fantastic