In Theaters Jul 13 2008 @ 02:34 pm

REVIEW: Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D

By Phillip Johnston
United States, 2008
Directed By: Eric Brevig
Written By: Michael Weiss, Jennifer Flackett, Mark Levin
Starring: Brendan Fraser, Josh Hutcherson, Anita Briem
Running Time: 92 minutes
Rated PG for intense adventure action and some scary moments.
(out of 5 stars)

Jules Verne’s Journey to the Center of the Earth has been used and abused by filmmakers for years. Who could forget the phony Scottish accent of standard crooner Pat Boone in the 1959 adaptation? Or last year’s 188-minute Hallmark Channel event? Even Wishbone got his paws on Jules Verne once or twice. Walden Media’s new take on on the story is less a conventional movie than a chance to show off what Real-D 3D projection can do. In fact, it functions best when computer graphics are exploded onto the screen and little firefly-birds are flapping their luminous blue wings in your face. There’s novelty to it for sure, but in the end it smells a bit like second-rate amusement park sideshow.

The first thing you should probably know about this version of Journey to the Center of the Earth is that it’s not an adaptation of Jules Verne’s classic tale. This Journey is about a down-and-out college physics professor named Trevor Andersen. Lately, Trevor has been troubled with dreams of his brother Max being chased by a T-Rex and finally falling into a lava-filled crevice. Heavy stuff, but its no matter. He wakes up, gets out of bed, brushes his teeth and leaves a second to spit directly into our 3D glasses as a reminder: “This is a 3D movie!”

After arriving at his college, Trevor is given the bad news that his lab will soon be turned into an administrative office. Upset and bewildered, he goes home to his messy house and sprawls on the couch, forgetting this is the day of his teenage nephew Sean’s arrival. Sean isn’t too excited about spending some quality time with his Uncle … he’d rather play with his PSP (product placement!) and drink Mountain Dew (more product placement!). You see, there’s some animosity here: Sean’s father is Max and he disappeared when the boy was young. Max was a physicist as well and ended up never coming back from some journey he took. I wonder where he was going?

Along with Sean comes a box of Max’s old belongings including a notated copy of *drumroll please* Journey to the Center of the Earth. Later on we learn that Max Andersen and a his scientist buddies were part of a radical group of thinkers. Called “Vernians”, these guys believed that the writings of Jules Verne weren’t just fantastical pieces of speculative fiction — they were actual fact. An intriguing idea, but if you think the movie is going to create an interesting mythology around Verne, you’d be wrong. That would actually be kind of cool, but sadly he just becomes a guidebook to get the Anderson boys and their attractive Icelandic mountain guide down a few volcanic tubes and into the center of the earth.

A few million pixels hard at work.
A few million pixels hard at work.

The script is in such a rush to get the this promised center-of-the-earth coolness that the characters are shoved to the wayside. I know, I know: this is just a kids’ action flick. I can deal with thin characters, but if you’re going to not develop them, please don’t try to make me care deeply about them in the final act. Regrettably, this is attempted in a completely laughable scene during the last half of the movie when Brendan Fraiser’s character reads a section out of his dead brother’s diary. The problem isn’t that a choked-up Fraser sounds identical to an angry Vince McMahon, but that we just want to get past all the melodrama and into the promised 3D dinosaur chase.

Man, boy, and mountain guide.
Man, boy, and mountain guide.

Neither the 3D or the dinosaur chase hold together too well. Sure, it’s kind of neat to see things in three dimensions, but its not nearly as beautiful or involving as the 3D presentations you’d find at an IMAX theater. Its also notable how much the first hour lacks any kind of uncertainty or apprehension about what is to come. There’s a mine car chase almost directly inspired by Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom, but it’s so unexciting that we just don’t care how it ends. A scene where Sean has to jump across magnetized rocks floating over a deep, dark, void doesn’t even give the suspense of a video game. Why? Well, because we know he’s got to get to the other side because we have to see the dinosaur chase.

I’m doing all this complaining, but the movie isn’t truly awful. Sure, there may not be much tension in the first half, but the second half does achieve a sense of immediacy. And it’s difficult not to smile when we finally do find out how our team of explorers gets out of the Center of the Earth and back home again — the only truly inspired and genuinely funny part of the movie. Still, Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D is a good reminder that story is king when it comes to the movies and that a few dashes of 3D spectacle can’t make up for an uninspiring narrative. I almost wished I could be 10 years old again, flip on PBS, and see the Wishbone version.

Almost.

13 Responses to “Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D”

  1. on Jul 14 2008 @ 1:28 am 1. Ryan Dunlap said …

    Any idea if this is being released in a non-3D version? I learned from an early age that having an astigmatism kinda ruins any sort of 3D fun…

    …on another note… would it even be fun without the 3D…?

  2. on Jul 14 2008 @ 8:00 am 2. Luke Harrington said …

    I happened to notice that this one is showing at some theaters in my town minus 3D. It’s a digital 3D format, so whenever it shows somewhere that doesn’t have a digital projector (i.e., most of the theaters in the world), it has to be in 2D. For what it’s worth.

  3. on Jul 14 2008 @ 8:16 am 3. Evan Derrick said …

    Ryan, have you tried out the ‘new’ 3D that they’re projecting these films in? It’s 1000 times better than the old red-and-blue business that gave you a headache 10 minutes in. I don’t know anything about astigmatisms, but it could be worth a shot. At the very least, pick a showtime and coincides with another film you’d like to see, and if you can’t handle the 3D, just pop into the other theater instead.

  4. on Jul 14 2008 @ 8:42 am 4. Phillip Johnston said …

    I remember when Rodriguez came out with Spy Kids 3D a few years ago … it was the red-and-blue stuff and the 3D sucked. This is much better, but its disappointing there isn’t a better movie backing it. Disney has a 3D movie about a stunt dog coming out that looks like it could be a better choice.

  5. on Jul 14 2008 @ 9:06 am 5. Evan Derrick said …

    I freaking died laughing at that Bolt trailer, especially the hyperkinetic hamster stuck in his little ball.

    “Are you hungry for danger?”

    “Starving!”

    I realize it is Disney, which counts for little to nothing these days, but I was charmed by the trailer.

  6. on Jul 14 2008 @ 9:27 am 6. Luke Harrington said …

    Agreed. It was the one preview before WALL-E that didn’t make me want to vomit. It’s tentatively on my “to see” list.

  7. on Jul 14 2008 @ 11:01 am 7. Ryan Dunlap said …

    Thanks for the heads up… Before I got the astigmatism, I remember seeing some 3D attractions at Disney as a little kid; but then when I went back in high school, none of them worked for me… kinda frustrating. I’ll have to see if the digital 3D works for me.

  8. on Jul 14 2008 @ 11:03 am 8. Nathan Keltner said …

    Re: 3D movies and astigmatism, I wonder if that’s what my problem is. I saw Beowulf at the IMAX and they had ~10 minutes in 3D, and it was horrible. I was sitting off to the side of the theatre, so I assumed it was my location that was messing up the experience. (I thought if I’d have gotten a center seat I wouldn’t have had problems.)

    But I’ve got wicked astigmatism, so maybe that’s the issue.

    Off topic: Ryan, are you the same Ryan Dunlap that grew up in Bville?

  9. on Jul 14 2008 @ 11:23 am 9. Ryan Dunlap said …

    The only time it’s worked for me is when I sit very, very far back, and even then it’s spotty.

    (sorry, grew up in Claremore/Tulsa)

  10. on Jul 14 2008 @ 6:31 pm 10. dan cicon said …

    The “House of Wax” 3 D effects of over 50 years ago were better than this 3D hyped center of the earth. What a disappointment. What 3 D effects there were were hardly noticeable. Awful. And the extrea $2.50 charged for the 3D glasses were a rip off

  11. on Jul 14 2008 @ 6:50 pm 11. Phillip Johnston said …

    Your theater charged you extra? Hmmm. My hometown theater’s prices just went down ($6.00 evening shows) and they threw in the glasses for free.

    Precarious.

  12. on Jul 17 2008 @ 12:26 pm 12. Luke Harrington said …

    Okay, Phillip…

    Just so you know, you’ve officially been put on my hit list. I read this review nearly a week ago, and I still haven’t been able to get the Wishbone theme song out of my head. Grr.

    :)

  13. on Jul 18 2008 @ 4:13 pm 13. Kristena said …

    Oooo… pretty pixels.

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply