In Theaters Jun 02 2008 @ 10:32 am
REVIEW: The Strangers
Directed By: Bryan Bertino
Written By: Bryan Bertino
Starring: Liv Tyler, Scott Speedman, Gemma Ward, Kip Weeks, Laura Margolis
Running Time: 90 minutes
Rated R for violence/terror and language
A few months ago, there was some controversy surrounding Michael Haneke’s remake of his own film Funny Games. In addition to the obvious disagreement over the film’s inherent value, many questioned why Haneke felt the need to remake himself. Bryan Bertino’s The Strangers answers this question definitively: Because, if you don’t (and often even if you do), Hollywood will. And they’ll royally screw it up.
The Strangers is essentially the exact same movie as Funny Games, except dumbed down so the target teen audience can understand it, and without the philosophical underpinnings, so people don’t feel bad about enjoying the sight of a young couple getting tortured to death. Most of the images and motifs are lifted directly from Haneke’s opus of audience-condescension: a couple alone in a summer home, a poorly aimed shotgun, ironic use of recorded music, a big blood stain on the wall. It’s possible this is all coincidence (after all, it’s not like the premise here is anything new, by any stretch of the imagination); if that’s the case, this is merely unfortunate. If not, it’s plain lazy, at best. But the fact remains that The Strangers will be insulting to horror fans, and offensive to nearly everyone.
The film starts off with about ten minutes that would seem to promise a good movie. The two main characters, Kristen (Liv Tyler) and James (Scott Speedman), are driving into the country in silence. Kristen is crying. At this point, first-time director Bertino has hooked us: Why is she crying? What happened?
Then, about ten minutes in, he tells us.
Okay, kids...spot the Scary Thing
Oh…so he proposed? And she said no? But they already had a weekend at this cabin planned, and nowhere else to go, so they went anyway, and now they’re stuck together and miserable? And they have conflicted emotions, which are ambiguously manifested in their still-burning lust for one another? Great! Sure glad we got that boring characterization out of the way, so we can proceed with the bloody mayhem! (If Liv Tyler’s face is still intact at the end of this thing, I want my money back. And please tell me the characters will do stupid things, like run directly into danger! Man, I am psyched…)
So anyway, now that we know the only interesting thing that there is to know about this couple, it’s time to treat them like so much hamburger. So first we get a knock at the door at three in the morning. This is, of course, scary. Just in case the audience doesn’t catch the scariness, we follow it immediately with a bunch of crashing percussion and chaotic, atonal strings. This, as any horror movie director knows, proves scariness beyond a doubt. So, of course, they open the door. Wait, what? It’s just a girl? And she just wonders if her friend is there? Oh—for a second there, I thought it would be scary. These filmmakers are masters of suspense. Wow.
Oh wait, never mind. She actually is a serial killer. And she brought two friends. And they all wear masks. Because masks are scary (particularly masks that look like cute dolls—man, I love this “irony” stuff!). So the rest of the movie proceeds about like you’re probably guessing it will. These three killers spend the evening toying with their victims. First they go inside and scare them. Then our happy couple runs outside and tries to escape. Then our friendly neighborhood killers meet them outside and scare them again. So they go back inside. So they scare them there. This is all, of course, underscored by a whole lot of pounding percussion and scratching violins, just to make sure the scariness of it all isn’t lost on you. Of course it all climaxes with the unmasking of the killers, and then Liv Tyler desperately asks why they’re doing this, and one of them delivers the line that you’ve already heard in the trailer. At this point there’s about ten minutes of film left, so I’m thinking maybe we’ll finally get some actual exposition—anything to justify the disgusting-but-actually-pretty-boring carnage we’ve just witnessed—but instead Bertino gives us one more lame jump scare. Thanks, Bryan! That one (unlike all the others I just saw) really made my day! What a great movie.
OMG, where did she get that cute jacket???
Of course, I’m left wondering, who likes this crap? The answer, apparently, is everyone. As I was leaving, I saw a line of people—all the way back to the door of the building—waiting to get into the theater. I’m not usually one to speak to strangers, but I had to warn them. You’ve already wasted your money. Don’t waste your time as well.
Ugh. Well. Let me close on a positive note: This film is the screenwriting and directorial debut of Bryan Bertino, who sold the screenplay as a spec script to Vertigo Entertainment—who then asked him to direct, despite the fact that his only real set experience was as a gaffer. Given that, Bertino’s actually showing some promise here. The lighting, the cinematography, and the editing are all pretty good; one imagines that with a little bit more experience and a slightly better script, Bertino could actually make a solid film. Heck, even this one might have been legitimately scary, if the score was…oh, I don’t know…COMPLETELY REMOVED. So who knows? Here’s hoping the guy’s career doesn’t end here. In the meantime, there is absolutely no reason for you to see The Strangers. Buy a ticket so Bertino can feed his kids; then tear it up and go home.
on Jun 02 2008 @ 11:41 am 1. Fox said …
Agree with your rating. The only reason I would give this film a 1/2 star is because of Liv Tyler. (I continue to be impressed by her.)
However, I part with you on your mild appreciation for Bertino’s skills. The very first scene - the shot of white knuckles on the steering wheel cutting to the red of the stop lights and brake lights - is well done, but overall I see little promise in this guy. Though, I surely don’t wish him any ill will.
on Jun 02 2008 @ 3:07 pm 2. Daniel said …
What a mess. I still hear about people who liked it, though, and it got some decent reviews here and there. Absolutely not something that interests me, thank you very much.
on Jun 02 2008 @ 8:02 pm 3. Rick Olson said …
“Ok, kids, spot the scary thing.” i love it.
What a mess is right.
on Jun 03 2008 @ 12:33 pm 4. Rachel said …
Okay, wow…you’re totally wrong about this being a remake of “Funny Games.” I mean come on, the two are totally different. “Funny Games” had two killers with three vicitims, while “The Strangers” clearly has three killers with two vicitims. The two movies are like night and day. The numbers don’t lie!!!
on Jun 03 2008 @ 1:32 pm 5. Luke Harrington said …
Ah…touche. I suppose I should be expecting a libel suit sometime soon.
Rachel, you crack me up. You should come by more often.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 11:39 am 6. Evan Derrick said …
You’re right, Luke, that IS a cute jacket! I HAVE to get me one of those.
“Ok kids, spot the scary thing…”
Favorite line of the week.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 12:57 pm 7. Joe P said …
I thought the movie was well put together…this is Bryan Bertino’s first movie EVER. Who cares if the story wasn’t as good as you wanted it to be? It is still very entertaining and left me asking so many questions. I might see it again to look at stuff I missed the first time.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 1:08 pm 8. Luke Harrington said …
Hey Joe, thanks for stopping by. If you didn’t notice, I’m actually pretty generous to Bertino in my review (see my last paragraph). But the fact that it was his first flick doesn’t make the movie itself any better. The whole thing is just an excuse to enjoy the suffering and death of other people - and it has absolutely nothing to say, other than “Wow, it’s fun to enjoy the suffering and death of other people!” Obviously, there are worse films that have been made, but I’d still prefer to spend my time watching something better.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 4:54 pm 9. Kristena said …
I’m actually loving the other she-psycho’s shirt. Awesome Peter Pan collar. And, to be honest, I kinda like her mask too.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 5:23 pm 10. Jeff McM said …
Well, I thought this was a perfectly good, if limited hororr movie, and it’s certainly better than Funny Games if for no other reason than because it’s honest about what it wants to do and doesn’t attempt to condescend to or humiliate its audience.
The enjoyment of a film like this comes not from watching a young couple be tortured and then murdered but rather from the audience absorbing themselves into the positions of those characters and feeling what it is to be frightened, tortured, etc. themselves.
If that’s not your cup of tea, then so be it, but please don’t ascribe such unpleasant motivations to the bulk of those of us who are happy to be scared for 90 minutes.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 7:17 pm 11. Luke Harrington said …
Yeah, okay. I would be more inclined to agree with your position, though, if the whole thing didn’t make me laugh so much. The timing, the music, and the general lack of character depth made it more amusing to me than scary. I try not to laugh during a “serious” film when I’m with other people, but I couldn’t help myself with this one…and it took itself so seriously. If it had been content to be what it was (a dumb B horror movie), I would have disliked it less…but it just had this general air of “THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT!!!”-ness.
on Jun 04 2008 @ 9:55 pm 12. Jeff McM said …
Well, either it works for you or it doesn’t. I didn’t feel an air of ‘importance’ but it certainly could have used more depth in theme or characterization.
on Jun 13 2008 @ 1:08 pm 13. Matt Gamble said …
“the audience absorbing themselves into the positions of those characters and feeling what it is to be frightened, tortured, etc. themselves.”
So torture and fear are okay for the audience to feel, but humiliation isn’t? I’m not sure how you can justify that statement. If anything Funny Games is far more successful at removing the barrier that seperates film from reality, and forces the audience to actually feel true emotions about what they are witnessing, while The Strangers simply relies on tired and true methods that will guide the viewers to the reactions they want. I’d much rather watch a film that promotes a visceral response from me then relies on cheap jump to build tension.
And the thing that annoyed me the most with The Strangers was how grossly overproduced it was. It beat it into your skull every 5 minutes that this film is really scary, because the music/masks/nocturnal woodpeckers say so. Blah.