<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Orphanage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/22/the-orphanage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/22/the-orphanage/</link>
	<description>zealous for all things film</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evan Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/22/the-orphanage/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=432#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Ok, let the comments section descend into SPOILER TERRITORY. Seriously, do not read any further if you haven't seen the movie.

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

SPOILING AHEAD

Ok, that should be good enough. Fletch, by 'a-ha' moment do you mean when she finds her son? As in, his disappearance wasn't really supernatural to begin with, but was her own fault? Hmmm...I guess you could say that is original, but its not a huge change from the standard formula. All of the major trappings - the house, the creepy kids, the mysterious disappearance - have been done before ad nauseum. A screenwriting friend once said that a cliche is not a cliche when it works, so while The Orphanage is built upon cliches, its not cliched in the slightest. In that sense I guess you could say it is highly original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let the comments section descend into SPOILER TERRITORY. Seriously, do not read any further if you haven&#8217;t seen the movie.</p>
<p>SPOILERS</p>
<p>SPOILERS</p>
<p>SPOILING AHEAD</p>
<p>Ok, that should be good enough. Fletch, by &#8216;a-ha&#8217; moment do you mean when she finds her son? As in, his disappearance wasn&#8217;t really supernatural to begin with, but was her own fault? Hmmm&#8230;I guess you could say that is original, but its not a huge change from the standard formula. All of the major trappings - the house, the creepy kids, the mysterious disappearance - have been done before ad nauseum. A screenwriting friend once said that a cliche is not a cliche when it works, so while The Orphanage is built upon cliches, its not cliched in the slightest. In that sense I guess you could say it is highly original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletch</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/22/the-orphanage/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=432#comment-953</guid>
		<description>I not a horror film expert, but I have to disagree with your point about the film more or less being unoriginal (albeit well done).  I don't want to spoil it for those that haven't seen it, but there's a certain catch (revealed during the a-ha moment) to The Orphanage that really made it for me.  It went from seeming unoriginal to being highly original.  No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I not a horror film expert, but I have to disagree with your point about the film more or less being unoriginal (albeit well done).  I don&#8217;t want to spoil it for those that haven&#8217;t seen it, but there&#8217;s a certain catch (revealed during the a-ha moment) to The Orphanage that really made it for me.  It went from seeming unoriginal to being highly original.  No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/22/the-orphanage/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/?p=432#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Sweet. I've been wanting to watch this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet. I&#8217;ve been wanting to watch this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.047 seconds -->
