<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juno</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/</link>
	<description>zealous for all things film</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Gotta tell ya, man...I always found Cliffs Notes ten times as boring as the actual literature. Sometimes I would try to read Cliffs Notes instead, only to give up and go back to the book. It was longer, but I got through it faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta tell ya, man&#8230;I always found Cliffs Notes ten times as boring as the actual literature. Sometimes I would try to read Cliffs Notes instead, only to give up and go back to the book. It was longer, but I got through it faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>Mike, you Philistine, you! Bow down before the altar of Shakespeare and beg forgiveness! 

Glad you liked Juno, man. It's interesting how many pro-lifeish movies have come out recently. They're not flagrantly pro-life, but they definitely lean in that direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, you Philistine, you! Bow down before the altar of Shakespeare and beg forgiveness! </p>
<p>Glad you liked Juno, man. It&#8217;s interesting how many pro-lifeish movies have come out recently. They&#8217;re not flagrantly pro-life, but they definitely lean in that direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>I thought Juno was very entertaining and funny.  The slang was hilarious, but I can see how it would bug people.  My bro-inlaw is one of those people.  The whole Planned Parenthood scene was great.  

Concerning WS, HS is the only time I had to read the guy.  And I read the Cliffs Notes.  "Are you ashamed?" you ask.  I am not ashamed, my friend!  For I had trig/calc to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Juno was very entertaining and funny.  The slang was hilarious, but I can see how it would bug people.  My bro-inlaw is one of those people.  The whole Planned Parenthood scene was great.  </p>
<p>Concerning WS, HS is the only time I had to read the guy.  And I read the Cliffs Notes.  &#8220;Are you ashamed?&#8221; you ask.  I am not ashamed, my friend!  For I had trig/calc to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>The Earl of Rochester? Really? I mean, sure, he wrote a few good poems and all, but...wow. The Earl of Rochester, huh? Huh. Okay.

It is funny what becomes "canon" in the art world (and most other disciplines, as well). A lot of times it has as much to do with timing and serendipity as anything. Once it's canonized, though, you're going to have a hard time changing that, particularly centuries down the road.

I'd like to see more people bow down before Christina Rossetti, but it ain't gonna happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Earl of Rochester? Really? I mean, sure, he wrote a few good poems and all, but&#8230;wow. The Earl of Rochester, huh? Huh. Okay.</p>
<p>It is funny what becomes &#8220;canon&#8221; in the art world (and most other disciplines, as well). A lot of times it has as much to do with timing and serendipity as anything. Once it&#8217;s canonized, though, you&#8217;re going to have a hard time changing that, particularly centuries down the road.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see more people bow down before Christina Rossetti, but it ain&#8217;t gonna happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>Wowee Colleen, I'd better not ask your opinion of Homer or Chaucer. :) 

I'm certainly no expert on Shakespeare, but you do make some interesting points on the blanket acceptance of his works as genius. Perhaps similar to Chaplin and Keaton's status as the silent masters, when Harold Lloyd, who was their equal in the heyday of silent comedy, was forgotten due to his movies being tied up in rights issues with his estate.

Seriously, thanks for adding your two cents, Colleen. I love it when the comments section derails and veers off into some bizarre--yet fascinating--tangent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wowee Colleen, I&#8217;d better not ask your opinion of Homer or Chaucer. <img src='http://www.moviezeal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly no expert on Shakespeare, but you do make some interesting points on the blanket acceptance of his works as genius. Perhaps similar to Chaplin and Keaton&#8217;s status as the silent masters, when Harold Lloyd, who was their equal in the heyday of silent comedy, was forgotten due to his movies being tied up in rights issues with his estate.</p>
<p>Seriously, thanks for adding your two cents, Colleen. I love it when the comments section derails and veers off into some bizarre&#8211;yet fascinating&#8211;tangent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>WS was one of hundreds of playwrights and poets populating England in the 16th and 17th century. You couldn't cast a stone without taking out some literary git that just so happend to be carring a copy of his lastest book of epigrams based on Martial. The Cavalier poets ruled the day, but we have been stuck with one flavour. I am not saying WS is bad... not at all. We have been done a diservice by having WS as the beginning middle and end of all things literary english. Give me the Earl of Rochester over the bard any day of the week. The real reason the WS holds out over others  is the facts WS friends gathered all of his plays together and bound them in one book. His works survives do to book binding and cheap moveable type and the good will of friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WS was one of hundreds of playwrights and poets populating England in the 16th and 17th century. You couldn&#8217;t cast a stone without taking out some literary git that just so happend to be carring a copy of his lastest book of epigrams based on Martial. The Cavalier poets ruled the day, but we have been stuck with one flavour. I am not saying WS is bad&#8230; not at all. We have been done a diservice by having WS as the beginning middle and end of all things literary english. Give me the Earl of Rochester over the bard any day of the week. The real reason the WS holds out over others  is the facts WS friends gathered all of his plays together and bound them in one book. His works survives do to book binding and cheap moveable type and the good will of friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>Heh. I'll warn the bard to stay away from you. :)

Seriously though, the guy practically &lt;i&gt;invented&lt;/i&gt; modern English. It's hard to overrate something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. I&#8217;ll warn the bard to stay away from you. <img src='http://www.moviezeal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though, the guy practically <i>invented</i> modern English. It&#8217;s hard to overrate something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>We should lynch Shakespeare, but not for Iambic Pentameter. WS cast such a large shadow over the entire world of playwriters, that he stiffles growth. Go to a bookstore and look at their litature section. WS has shelves (plural) of his works sitting around. Do you see anything by Bernard Shaw, or Thomas Campion, Robert Herrick? Propably not. Shakespeare is IVY. It grows fast and spreads intill everything under it dies from lack of light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should lynch Shakespeare, but not for Iambic Pentameter. WS cast such a large shadow over the entire world of playwriters, that he stiffles growth. Go to a bookstore and look at their litature section. WS has shelves (plural) of his works sitting around. Do you see anything by Bernard Shaw, or Thomas Campion, Robert Herrick? Propably not. Shakespeare is IVY. It grows fast and spreads intill everything under it dies from lack of light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>It is weird how much people's high school experiences color their very perception of life. I knew tons of people like Juno in high school, but that was the sort of clique I ran with. What's "realistic" is really just a matter of your experiences.

And while we're on the subject - why is realistic dialogue such a holy grail to some people? Shouldn't artists be allowed to stylize their subjects if they want? Or should we lynch Shakespeare for writing in iambic pentameter? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is weird how much people&#8217;s high school experiences color their very perception of life. I knew tons of people like Juno in high school, but that was the sort of clique I ran with. What&#8217;s &#8220;realistic&#8221; is really just a matter of your experiences.</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re on the subject - why is realistic dialogue such a holy grail to some people? Shouldn&#8217;t artists be allowed to stylize their subjects if they want? Or should we lynch Shakespeare for writing in iambic pentameter? <img src='http://www.moviezeal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/04/15/review-juno/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviezeal.com/2008/02/07/review-juno/#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>I too loved Juno. It did just manage to squeak into my top ten of 2007. I know alot of people have big issues with the dialogue. They claim that no 15yr old would ever talk like that or have weird discussion on obscure film or music. This just boggles my mind, because taking in weird slang, and discussing strange music and film, was just about all my friends did in high school. I pity those people's boring teenage years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too loved Juno. It did just manage to squeak into my top ten of 2007. I know alot of people have big issues with the dialogue. They claim that no 15yr old would ever talk like that or have weird discussion on obscure film or music. This just boggles my mind, because taking in weird slang, and discussing strange music and film, was just about all my friends did in high school. I pity those people&#8217;s boring teenage years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.697 seconds -->
